<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chicken John Rinaldi For Mayor of San Francisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voteforchicken.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voteforchicken.com</link>
	<description>city of art and innovation</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Great night&#8230; by RockBandit.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fear not&#8230; I am alive!</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/10/12/great-night/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>RockBandit.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fear not&#8230; I am alive!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/10/12/great-night/#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>[...] San Francisco! Luckily, I was there to document the event. And my photos were posted on a variety of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] San Francisco! Luckily, I was there to document the event. And my photos were posted on a variety of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exausted&#8230; by James Lamb</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/19/exausted/#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/19/exausted/#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>Is the counting over yet ?  I heard Gavin's proposing biodiesel for something, so maybe the wood-burning truck had some effect, or maybe it came from a Vanity Fair article; who knows ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the counting over yet ?  I heard Gavin&#8217;s proposing biodiesel for something, so maybe the wood-burning truck had some effect, or maybe it came from a Vanity Fair article; who knows ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chuck Sperry silkscreening 250 posters for fundraising&#8230; by fetchingphoto</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/10/25/endorsement-party-from-the-leage-of-pissed-off-voters/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>fetchingphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/10/25/endorsement-party-from-the-leage-of-pissed-off-voters/#comment-760</guid>
		<description>I think it's important to note, and give credit to, San Francisco Chronicle photographer Chris Stewart, who took the original photo of Chicken that this illustration is based on.

I wonder, did someone ask Stewart for permission to use his image?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s important to note, and give credit to, San Francisco Chronicle photographer Chris Stewart, who took the original photo of Chicken that this illustration is based on.</p>
<p>I wonder, did someone ask Stewart for permission to use his image?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chicken and Gavin debate video&#8230; and some other stuff&#8230; by Chicken John Debates A Gavin Newsom Puppet &#124; Laughing Squid</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/05/chicken-and-gavin-debate-video-and-some-other-stuff/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicken John Debates A Gavin Newsom Puppet &#124; Laughing Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/05/chicken-and-gavin-debate-video-and-some-other-stuff/#comment-741</guid>
		<description>[...] Saturday night, Chicken John had a mayoral debate with a Gavin Newsom puppet at his Chez Poulet election headquarters. EmmettG and GavinWatch have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saturday night, Chicken John had a mayoral debate with a Gavin Newsom puppet at his Chez Poulet election headquarters. EmmettG and GavinWatch have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chicken and Gavin debate video&#8230; and some other stuff&#8230; by Chicken John Debates Newsom &#171; Gavin Sucks.com</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/05/chicken-and-gavin-debate-video-and-some-other-stuff/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicken John Debates Newsom &#171; Gavin Sucks.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/05/chicken-and-gavin-debate-video-and-some-other-stuff/#comment-737</guid>
		<description>[...] Chicken &#38; Gavin Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chicken &amp; Gavin Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CHICKEN: Monday evening appeal at the Ethics Commission, precincts,ribbon cutting and Losers Ball by Larnie Fox</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/05/chicken-monday-evening-appeal-at-the-ethics-commission-precinctsribbon-cutting-and-losers-ball/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Larnie Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/05/chicken-monday-evening-appeal-at-the-ethics-commission-precinctsribbon-cutting-and-losers-ball/#comment-734</guid>
		<description>Just sent to all "Ethics" commissioners:


John St. Croix, Executive Director     john.st.croix@sfgov.org
Susan Harriman, Chairperson      sharriman@kvn.com
Emi Gusuka, Vice-Chairperson   egusukuma@haasnaja.com
Eileen Hansen, Commissioner    eileenhansensf8@yahoo.com
Jamienne S. Studley, Commissioner     jstudley@publicadvocates.org
Charles L. Ward, Commissioner        cward@ybca.org

Dear Commissioner,

I am an San Francisco resident, and an arts administrator for the City of Palo Alto. I was shocked and disappointed to see the way one of the mayoral candidates, "Chicken" John Rinaldi was treated by your commission. 

I was under the impression that public funding (matching funds) as administered by the Ethics Commission as a way to invite grass-roots organizations and non-mainstream candidates into the system, as a way of keeping the playing field more even so that the ideas favored by big money would not always dominate the discussion. 

Judging by your actions as committee, I now see that you are there to keep the status quo, and keep "the little guys" out of the public eye. 

I must admit, the way the process works seems ethical at first glance, but that is deceptive. It is clearly loaded in favor of big money. 

Specifically: 

• Your minutes should match the actual content of your meetings. See:
http://www.chickenjohn.com/ethics2.html

• Donations via Pay-Pal should of course be accepted as legitimate! Don't we live in the center of the high-tech world?

• There should be clear, concise and understandable parameters of what will be accepted as proof of address. 

• Small cash donations should be acceptable with sworn statement. 

• It should be easier for people who have moved recently, or who have expired driver's licenses, or people whose business name is on their personal checks, or have other minor discrepancies to have their donations counted. 

• You should understand that with grass-roots organizations, there will be a few typos or other mistakes. These organizations should not be punished for this. 

Please be on the side of "small d" democracy! Many of us will be closely watching the outcome of this situation. Of course, you did already succeed in muffling an important voice in favor of the arts, and of renters, and of local color during the election. Hopefully you will change your priorities before the next one. 

Larnie Fox
San Francisco, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just sent to all &#8220;Ethics&#8221; commissioners:</p>
<p>John St. Croix, Executive Director     <a href="mailto:john.st.croix@sfgov.org">john.st.croix@sfgov.org</a><br />
Susan Harriman, Chairperson      <a href="mailto:sharriman@kvn.com">sharriman@kvn.com</a><br />
Emi Gusuka, Vice-Chairperson   <a href="mailto:egusukuma@haasnaja.com">egusukuma@haasnaja.com</a><br />
Eileen Hansen, Commissioner    <a href="mailto:eileenhansensf8@yahoo.com">eileenhansensf8@yahoo.com</a><br />
Jamienne S. Studley, Commissioner     <a href="mailto:jstudley@publicadvocates.org">jstudley@publicadvocates.org</a><br />
Charles L. Ward, Commissioner        <a href="mailto:cward@ybca.org">cward@ybca.org</a></p>
<p>Dear Commissioner,</p>
<p>I am an San Francisco resident, and an arts administrator for the City of Palo Alto. I was shocked and disappointed to see the way one of the mayoral candidates, &#8220;Chicken&#8221; John Rinaldi was treated by your commission. </p>
<p>I was under the impression that public funding (matching funds) as administered by the Ethics Commission as a way to invite grass-roots organizations and non-mainstream candidates into the system, as a way of keeping the playing field more even so that the ideas favored by big money would not always dominate the discussion. </p>
<p>Judging by your actions as committee, I now see that you are there to keep the status quo, and keep &#8220;the little guys&#8221; out of the public eye. </p>
<p>I must admit, the way the process works seems ethical at first glance, but that is deceptive. It is clearly loaded in favor of big money. </p>
<p>Specifically: </p>
<p>• Your minutes should match the actual content of your meetings. See:<br />
<a href="http://www.chickenjohn.com/ethics2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.chickenjohn.com/ethics2.html</a></p>
<p>• Donations via Pay-Pal should of course be accepted as legitimate! Don&#8217;t we live in the center of the high-tech world?</p>
<p>• There should be clear, concise and understandable parameters of what will be accepted as proof of address. </p>
<p>• Small cash donations should be acceptable with sworn statement. </p>
<p>• It should be easier for people who have moved recently, or who have expired driver&#8217;s licenses, or people whose business name is on their personal checks, or have other minor discrepancies to have their donations counted. </p>
<p>• You should understand that with grass-roots organizations, there will be a few typos or other mistakes. These organizations should not be punished for this. </p>
<p>Please be on the side of &#8220;small d&#8221; democracy! Many of us will be closely watching the outcome of this situation. Of course, you did already succeed in muffling an important voice in favor of the arts, and of renters, and of local color during the election. Hopefully you will change your priorities before the next one. </p>
<p>Larnie Fox<br />
San Francisco, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CHICKEN: Monday evening appeal at the Ethics Commission, precincts,ribbon cutting and Losers Ball by Dawn Stott</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/05/chicken-monday-evening-appeal-at-the-ethics-commission-precinctsribbon-cutting-and-losers-ball/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Stott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/11/05/chicken-monday-evening-appeal-at-the-ethics-commission-precinctsribbon-cutting-and-losers-ball/#comment-731</guid>
		<description>Good luck tonight!  I work the closing shift now until 7 or 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck tonight!  I work the closing shift now until 7 or 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please support me in the only &#8216;real&#8217; debate tomorrow (which is actually a forum) by Impaity</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/10/10/please-support-me-in-the-only-real-debate-tomorrow-which-is-actually-a-forum/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Impaity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/10/10/please-support-me-in-the-only-real-debate-tomorrow-which-is-actually-a-forum/#comment-727</guid>
		<description>Thank you! I delighted! 
&lt;a href="http://taxi-crimea.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;we beg pardon&lt;/a&gt; http://taxi-crimea.com 
 The Regard! The Excellent forum! Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! I delighted!<br />
<a href="http://taxi-crimea.com" rel="nofollow">we beg pardon</a> <a href="http://taxi-crimea.com" rel="nofollow">http://taxi-crimea.com</a><br />
 The Regard! The Excellent forum! Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tomorrow Graffiti clean up at Toxic Tire Beach&#8230; please read&#8230; by Johnny come lately</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/08/03/chicken-tomorrow-graffiti-clean-up-at-toxic-tire-beach-please-read/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny come lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/08/03/chicken-tomorrow-graffiti-clean-up-at-toxic-tire-beach-please-read/#comment-703</guid>
		<description>Please stop calling the graffiti that previously existed at tire beach 'murals'. What made wwc unique was that it was real graffiti, not community art or murals. The spot is lost, the graff is exploding in the streets, and frankly,"murals", with the exception of Rivera and a few others are boring and static and very often crappy. Nuru won his spot back at wwc. They never really gave a shit about the "community" (outside of Pacific Heights).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stop calling the graffiti that previously existed at tire beach &#8216;murals&#8217;. What made wwc unique was that it was real graffiti, not community art or murals. The spot is lost, the graff is exploding in the streets, and frankly,&#8221;murals&#8221;, with the exception of Rivera and a few others are boring and static and very often crappy. Nuru won his spot back at wwc. They never really gave a shit about the &#8220;community&#8221; (outside of Pacific Heights).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letter to the SF Chronicle&#8230; by Dav</title>
		<link>http://voteforchicken.com/2007/10/24/letter-to-the-sf-chronicle/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Dav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteforchicken.com/2007/10/24/letter-to-the-sf-chronicle/#comment-673</guid>
		<description>Wow, that's about the most lucid pithy thing from Chicken John I've ever read. Not to mention the best spell-checked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s about the most lucid pithy thing from Chicken John I&#8217;ve ever read. Not to mention the best spell-checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
